That’s all of it summed up into two main principles. If we accept any part of either of these principles, we have accepted a false doctrine, right? An entity is the one who clearly articulated these two ideas, not me. They are lynch pins for spiritualism. To accept either one (or its offspring) is dangerous ground.
Any healing method which gives you “dominion over your body for healing,” is not God’s way! It does not rely on God, but self. It is the way which evil spirits advocate and teach. This may be tough to swallow because I, like you, feel there is a certain amount of brain power God gave us to use. There are scientific facts we understand. We know our cells use electrical signals to communicate. We know electromagnetic frequencies & fields (EMF) are all around us and that they DO affect our bodies. We know electrical and magnetic energy does exist in the human body; modern medicine operates off this principle with its use of EEGs, EKGs, MRIs, and TENS units. But, the lines can get blurry. I believe Satan has masterfully blurred the line between the scientific understanding of how cells work and how HE says they work. It is easy to cross over the line of known science when we start working with the “energy” concepts of the cell because he has brought in a false doctrine about the “energy” of the cell.
Cells having thought and memory, subtle frequencies, auras, vibrational medicine (in context of the New Age), universal/subtle energy that can be harnessed, guided, or utilized in some way for healing — are all in the realm of pseudoscience that Satan is bombarding us with in the present day. It all ties in with accepting what the entity stated his mission was: to “reinforce the harmonization in regards to the specifics of the body cell.” At its core level, it is actually dealing with universal energy, Chi, Qi, and Prana. Can you see this? I pray you will strongly ponder this.
The early work of Dr. Albert Abrams and Radionics was focused on “healing underlying imbalances” of diseased tissues. I have looked this up on dozens of websites and consistently find that Abrams was referring to “universal energy” when he talked about healing the “underlying imbalance of diseased tissues”. He was working with the flip side of measurable energy. He was working with “supposed energy fields or biofields which contend that humans are infused with a subtle energy that flows throughout the body”. This is universal energy! This is the false doctrine about body energy. Radionics began on this premise. Rife’s work was the offspring of radionics. Rife’s machine is also found, over and over, to be in the same class of healing devices. Royal Rife is embraced by, classified with, and listed as a practitioner in the Energetic Medicine field — the field of energy medicine that is working with—“subtle energy,” universal energy. While his work may sound like modern medicine, the roots of it go way back. And this is consistent with what the entity said.
In regard to the premise of how Rife’s frequencies selectively target pathogens, yet no known science can prove this, I CAN accept the simple fact that an entity said Rife’s work “went beyond the normal and scientific approaches,” and that: “he saw the energy and aura, vibrational field, and chakra around the cell.” Rife saw the energetic part of the cell that Satan is using to dupe many people today. This alone, is cause for me to take a few steps back from Rife and question it.
Is it possible that the Rife machine caters to what the entity talked about — that we can have dominion over our bodies for healing? That we can take some kind of control, or play some kind of part in healing our bodies vs. a reliance on God and His strength, His simple laws of health, His simple remedies? Is it possible Rife is in-line with the demonic approach of appealing to self by making you think you have “advanced knowledge” beyond what most people understand and know about? Is it possible Rife’s technology IS in line with greater “self-realization” (as the entity said Rife’s goal was), and instills the idea that YOU are able to influence and bring about—healing? If so, you’ve been duped.
In the case of Rife, his vibrational medicine is connected with New Age, energetic medicine. There are countless clairvoyants, psychics, chakra balancers, spiritual healers, and many other occult practitioners who all resonate with Rife. They all advocate his machine. They all applaud his work, who he was, and what he contributed to the field. Why is Rife front and center with so many in this crowd?
Please consider this statement found on a Christian website, not EGW:
“If Christians find out that there is some spiritual involvement at the roots (of a healing practice) they should avoid it altogether unless the method or medicine itself is totally divorced from its esoteric foundation. Further, they should also examine the fruit. This is not always easy to discern. If there is even a faint form of deception, fraud, unusual claims for diagnosis or treatment, or a financial situation that requires burdensome commitments, Christians should flee at once. “Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry,” I Cor. 10:14. If it becomes necessary to alter the consciousness (either by meditation or certain herbs or drugs) or perform rituals for the body, or any other thing that numbs the mind or senses, then the occult should be suspected.”
OK, so what if you are positive Rife deals only with “known” frequencies, resonance, and “known” laws of physics)? Let me share a few more points.
In the 1970s interview about Royal Rife John Hubbard interviews Ben Cullen, a man who knew Royal Rife for years. ( http://www.rifevideos.com/interviews_of_those_who_knew_royal_rife.html,) The context of the website posting these interviews is one of support for Royal Rife and his work. In the interview, Ben says:
“I followed Rife every night. I went out to work with Rife. There was so much we could talk about in each other’s language that we communicated well. I was a journeyman and tool and die maker from England and Rife was 100% Scotch. I made a steady pilgrimage to Rife’s garage where we set up a shop with machinery to build his microscopes. Rife began to become deeply involved in bacteriology. We would discuss microorganisms. We began to install (in his workshop) equipment tools and machines.”
“In 1933, we began to build Rife’s third microscope, the big Universal Microscope. Rife also developed the Rife Ray Machine.”
Okay, so Ben obviously was someone who knew Royal Rife well. He speaks very highly of Dr. Rife and considered himself a good friend.
As the interview continues, you get to a part where Mr. Hubbard asks Ben Cullen:
Hubbard: (continuing)…Was Rife very religious?
Cullen: “Not too much, no. He was very psychic. He could draw from the ocean of mind – which I call it, another side – information about many things he couldn’t have in his conscious state. As I told you, when he wanted an answer he would put his pad and pencil by his bedside and between 11 and 2 o’clock he always got his answer.”
So, here we have a friend of Dr. Rife saying he perceived Dr. Rife as a “psychic.” Not only that, he says Rife actually received “answers to his questions” through automatic writing. While he was unconscious, sleeping, it magically showed up on the paper he placed by his bedside. For a Christian seeking healing, this is not a good foundation to build upon! I believe this interview validates what the entity said about Rife being clairvoyant. Rife’s own friend says he was psychic! The spiritualistic ties are too strong. Why would the entity say the whole basis for his machine was begun thru his clairvoyant ability to see the aura of the cell? Is this a lie? If so, why do all the psychics and New Ager’s get so excited about his contributions to vibrational medicine? Could it be that it’s because they feel he validated their occult theories about vibrations? This is what the entity said as well…that Rife found the vibratory force of all creation.
Please, prayerfully consider what I’m saying. While Rife may sound plausible, I believe it is built on a very wrong foundation. It actually has entities “being sent” to advocate the principles behind it and the work of Royal Rife. Now that in and of itself (in my opinion) should be cause to have nothing to do with it…whether it works, or not.
If you want a medical/scientific argument to consider, here are some statements in regard to the known physical principles of how Rife works posted on an on-line FORUM. Of course, you may disagree and say these guys don’t know what they are talking about, but at least take a look and see what you think. However, please don’t let these arguments side-track you from considering the whole spiritualistic side of it. Here is a cut-and-paste of their conversation:
As for the Rife machine, any device that will kill a cancer cell, bacteria, virus, or any other living matter via EMF (electromagnetic frequency) will kill a healthy cell as well. Not sure where you get the notion that EMF will only discriminate living matter we humans deem to be pests and not our own healthy cells. EMF is merely energy. It has no ability to destroy a bacteria just on the basis of it being infectious to humans.
The term “frequency” apparently has magical connotations for some people. I can say that light has a certain frequency, or that a microwave oven cooks with radiation of a certain frequency (or band of frequencies, actually, not just “one” discrete frequency), and so on. Most of us don’t understand light or electromagnetic radiation at all, although we talk about it, and we can measure it and make devices that generate it. In our minds, it’s easier for us to understand sound, and that’s where most of us get our understandings of “frequencies” and waves. We understand sound frequencies more easily, although sound is a mechanical wave, but we can say the same thing about sound: it has a certain frequency or frequencies. A particular piano key will play middle C.
We can measure these frequencies, such as in the case of something that is emitting electromagnetic radiation or sound. Measuring a frequency or frequencies that something emits is one thing, but to measure what something absorbs is a little bit more difficult sometimes. Scientists, being curious by nature, have actually measured the absorption spectra of living cells, beginning many decades ago, and what’s fascinating is that the art has progressed to the point of being able to track biochemical transformations within a living cell, such as where carotenoids are distributed. Those who postulate that microorganisms (or even cancer cells) have their own “frequencies” don’t get more specific than the amorphous term “frequency,” so I don’t know what they mean by that generally. Since a blue shirt will absorb light except for blue, which it reflects, if someone wants to know what the “frequency” is of that blue shirt, do they mean what it absorbs, what it reflects, or what?
Infrared radiation (IR) is composed of a wide spectrum of frequencies, and if we stand next to something emitting IR, we’re going to get warm, and you can’t describe us as having any one frequency or another.
Similarly, if you put a coffee cup and saucer on top of a bass speaker, you’ll discover that there is no “the” frequency that makes the coffee cup shake on its saucer, although experimentation might reveal that it shakes more at certain frequencies (i.e., that some kind of resonance exists.)
To look at a bacterium or fungus and say that it “has” some kind of “frequency” is puzzling to me. We have all manner of instruments in the laboratory that can measure what objects or substances can absorb or reflect, electromagnetically, as well as what they emit.
I’d like to know how you are going to say that a particular organism, let’s say a batch of Clostridium botulinum growing in your test tube, “has” some kind of “frequency.” Exactly what do you mean by that? How do you “know” if you start treating your test tube with various frequencies of radiation, whether microwave, radio, visual, or any of it, (or of sound, which, let us remember is not part of the electromagnetic spectrum), that any one particular frequency is “the frequency” of that organism?
The implicit assumption being made here (about the Rife machine) is that every single organism can be identified by a particular, unique frequency of radiation that will kill it, and it alone, so that, even when mixed among millions of bodily cells, a particular pathogen will up and die when the body it’s in is treated with that particular frequency.
This is a testable proposition. You could mix up some e. coli and some c. botulinum in a test tube, and treat that mix with various frequencies of radiation, so that eventually you would be able to say, oh yes, frequency X will kill the e. coli, and frequency Y will kill c. botulinum.
It is true that some radiation is lethal to everything, and that some species are more sensitive to some than to others. A bacterium that thrives near a volcanic vent would probably be much less sensitive to IR radiation than one found in the mold on your cheese that had been hiding in the back of your fridge for several months.
But to assert, not only that such particular wavelengths–“the” frequencies– exist, but that you can apply those particular frequencies to a human organism and have those “the” frequencies manifest themselves throughout an entire human organism so as to kill only a particular pathogen, while being totally inert to healthy cells, strikes me as a rather strange hypothesis. If all the organisms that you’re trying to kill are in one place, then that’s exactly what radiation therapy to treat cancer does: it kills only a particular set of cells, because the radiation only reaches the abnormal cells at which it is aimed (not really “only” the cancer cells, but mostly, since they can’t be 100% perfect in their aim.) And thermal therapy–the use of heat to kill invading organisms–is something that your body already uses; it’s called a fever, but it is not harmless to normal cells, since people can die from it. One form of radiation therapy, total body irradiation (TBI) uses the same principle: but it’s not harmless to normal cells either.